next step in the investigation of the use of informants by the Department of Justice
Read Online

next step in the investigation of the use of informants by the Department of Justice the testimony of William Bulger : hearing before the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, first session, June 19, 2003 by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform

  • 429 Want to read
  • ·
  • 12 Currently reading

Published by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. in Washington .
Written in English


  • Bulger, Whitey, -- 1929-,
  • United States. -- Federal Bureau of Investigation,
  • Informers -- United States,
  • Political corruption -- Massachusetts

Book details:

Edition Notes

Other titlesTestimony of William Bulger
The Physical Object
Paginationiii, 117 p. ;
Number of Pages117
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL14537685M
ISBN 100160708613

Download next step in the investigation of the use of informants by the Department of Justice


U.S. Department of Justice guidelines regarding the use of confidential informants in criminal investigations and prosecutions. Department of Justice Law Enforcement Agencies and Federal Prosecuting Offices, as defined below. I. These Guidelines do not apply to the use of Cooperating Defendants/Witnesses or Sources oflnfomlation, as defined below, unless a Department of Justice Law Enforcement Agency, in its discretion, chooses to apply these Guidelines to such persons.   The pervasive use of informants throughout the U.S criminal justice system exacerbates four central problems: unreli-ability, crime, inequality and secrecy. Because informant use is so secretive, many of these problems in turn have slipped beneath the public radar. A. Unreliability Information obtained from informants is infamously unreliable. A confidential informant used in a narcotics case is supposed to provide concrete and reliable evidence against someone conducting illegal activity with narcotics. Using an informant is a risk that can be helpful or detrimental to a narcotics arrest, and its success is contingent upon confidential informant narcotic.

Homeland Security Investigation (DHS/HSI) The investigators at these agencies investigate the crime and obtain evidence, and help prosecutors understand the details of the case. The prosecutor may work with just one agency but, many times, several investigating agencies are involved. Part of the investigation may involve a search warrant. The police are generally not required to conduct investigation to uncover the confidential informant’s identity if it’s unknown to them. Use It or Lose It. There are two opportunities to find out the identity of a confidential informant: before and during trial. Informant-A person who gives information to law enforcement about the criminal activity of others. Types of informants: Criminal informant-An informant that developed the information through his own criminal activity or associations. Ordinary citizen-An informant that was a victim or eyewitness to a crime. Start studying Criminal Investigation Chapter 9. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. (It was developed by the California Department of Justice and It stands for Victims Capture Perpetrators) This type of informant is .

does not use informants in a way that violates individual privacy or over-steps other proper investigative boundaries. INTRODUCTION Informants, otherwise known as "snitches" or "rats," are people who report to the authorities on the criminal activity of others. 1 In-formants may be one-time providers of information or recurring agents.   The Case Of A Confidential Informant Gone Wrong Confidential informants, or people who pose as criminals so they can provide information to .   This is the current and official copy of the Justice Manual (JM). The JM was previously known as the United States Attorneys’ Manual (USAM). It was comprehensively revised and renamed in Sections may be updated periodically. In general, . some problems in working with informants are (1) that of investigators and informants becoming too close of friends, (2) Sexual misconduct occurring between informants and officers of the opposite sex, (3) Informants committing criminal activities, (4) The idea an officer may have that the informant is his rather than an individual who can be.